Yes. In healthy adults with normal kidney function, creatine monohydrate hasn't been shown to damage the kidneys, even at high doses over several years. The confusion comes from a blood test: creatine breaks down into creatinine, the same marker used to estimate kidney function, so levels rise without any actual drop in filtration.[1][2]
That last part is the whole story. Someone starts creatine, gets a routine blood panel a few weeks later, and sees "creatinine" flagged high or borderline. It looks like a kidney number went the wrong direction. It didn't. Creatine and creatinine are one letter apart, and the standard panel measures the second one without telling you where it came from.
Why does creatine raise a kidney number, then?
Creatinine isn't a separate substance your kidneys are struggling to clear. It's what creatine turns into. Creatine breaks down into creatinine on its own, at a fairly steady rate of about 2% of your total body creatine store per day, whether or not your kidneys are doing anything differently.[2] Take more creatine, hold more of it in muscle, and you produce more creatinine as a byproduct. That's chemistry, not injury.
The reason this fools a standard lab report is how the report is built. Doctors don't usually measure how fast your kidneys filter blood directly. They estimate it, using a formula that takes your serum creatinine and backs into a number called eGFR. Feed that formula a higher creatinine reading and it spits out a lower eGFR, even if your kidneys haven't changed at all. The US National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases notes that creatinine-based eGFR "may not perform reliably in patients with extremes in body size, muscle mass, or diet, including... bodybuilders," and that "creatinine levels can be affected by muscle mass" independent of actual kidney injury.[4] Creatine supplementation pushes on that exact soft spot, and reviewers looking specifically at creatine users note they can carry a higher serum creatinine with no impairment in kidney function.[3] A researcher measuring your kidneys directly, instead of estimating from creatinine, would see the difference.
This isn't an obscure edge case, either. Bodybuilders and other unusually muscular people show the same creatinine-without-kidney-change pattern for the plain reason that more muscle means more creatine turning over into creatinine at baseline, with no bearing on how well the kidneys are actually filtering.[2][4] Add a supplemental dose of creatine on top of that, and the reading climbs further, at exactly the point in someone's routine when they're also the type to get bloodwork done for a physical or a training check-in.
What does the direct research actually show?
Start with the study that measured filtration itself, not an estimate. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial gave resistance-trained men already eating a high-protein diet either creatine (20 g a day for 5 days, then 5 g a day) or a placebo for 12 weeks, and measured glomerular filtration rate with 51Cr-EDTA clearance, a gold-standard method that doesn't rely on creatinine at all. There was no significant difference between the groups. Creatinine clearance, blood and urine urea, and electrolytes stayed "virtually unchanged," and nobody in either group developed protein or albumin in their urine.[6] That's close to the person actually asking this question: someone already lifting, already eating enough protein to worry a nervous internet comment section, and their kidneys didn't move.
That result matches the longer-running data. The International Society of Sports Nutrition's position stand on creatine cites work showing that 20 g a day for 5 days, and separately up to 10 g a day for 10 months to 5 years, had no effect on creatine clearance, glomerular filtration rate, tubular resorption, or the kidney's membrane permeability compared with people not taking it. Its overall conclusion: "There is no compelling evidence that creatine supplementation negatively affects renal function in healthy or clinical populations."[1]
A 2025 meta-analysis pooling 12 controlled trials (177 people on creatine, 263 controls) found a statistically significant rise in serum creatinine, and it's worth being honest about the size of it: an average difference of 0.07 micromoles per liter, which is a rounding error next to normal lab variation. That significant bump was concentrated in trials with a week or less of follow-up, which is to say, during a loading phase. Glomerular filtration rate itself showed no significant difference between groups. The paper's own conclusion: the creatinine change looks like "metabolic turnover rather than renal impairment," and GFR was preserved.[5] In other words, even the study built to find the smallest possible signal in the number people worry about still didn't find a kidney problem.
If you're on the loading dose, this is where the effect concentrates. It fades once you're back on a normal daily amount, and it was never a filtration change to begin with.
What if you already have kidney disease?
Everything above describes people with normal kidney function going in. If you have diagnosed kidney disease, or you know your kidney function is already reduced, that's not something to settle from a blog post. Reviewers in this space are explicit that people with a very low glomerular filtration rate from existing kidney disease should refrain from creatine, and that anyone with reduced kidney function should only use it under close medical supervision, with monitoring that doesn't rely on creatinine alone.[2][3] Bring it up with the clinician who has your actual labs. This isn't a case where the general research applies to you by default.
What's actually in the tub
What AUROM controls is what's in the tub: one ingredient, 5 g of micronized creatine monohydrate per scoop, nothing else. No proprietary blend, no filler, no second or third ingredient that could be doing something to a lab result you'd never think to ask about. Every batch has a Certificate of Analysis available on request.
That matters here specifically. If a lab number ever does move and you're trying to figure out why, you want a short, printed answer for what you're actually taking, not a guessing game through a blend label. There's one ingredient to rule in or out, at a dose that's on the tub, not hidden behind a proprietary name.
The tub itself is 250 g, about a 50-day supply at 5 g a day, delivered on that same 50-day schedule so you're not switching brands or stacking in something new every few weeks either.
Frequently asked questions
Will creatine show up as a problem on a routine blood test? It can raise your serum creatinine reading, which some panels flag automatically. That's expected and, in someone with normal kidney function, not a sign of kidney damage. It's worth mentioning you take creatine when a doctor reviews your labs, so they read the number in context instead of chasing it.
Should I get my kidneys checked before I start? Not because of creatine specifically, if you're a healthy adult. If you already have kidney disease or a condition that affects kidney function, that's a conversation to have with your clinician before starting, not after.
Does the loading dose matter more than the daily dose? The research showing a measurable creatinine change concentrates in short, loading-style dosing of a week or less.[5] Skipping the load and starting at a daily maintenance amount avoids that specific bump, though it takes longer to reach the same effect.
Can I just stop taking it before a blood test to be safe? You don't need to for kidney reasons. If a raised creatinine is confusing a specific test result, tell whoever ordered it that you take creatine. That's a more useful fix than stopping and restarting around appointments.
Is there a dose that's considered safe for long-term use? The research cited above covers up to 10 g a day for 10 months to 5 years, and 20 g a day through a 5-day loading phase, without kidney harm in healthy adults.[1] The same position stand puts the ongoing maintenance amount at 3 to 5 g a day once muscle stores are full.[1] AUROM's scoop is 5 g.
Will creatine throw off an eGFR reading being used to monitor something else? It can, for the same reason: the formula behind eGFR reads a higher creatinine and reports a lower number, whether or not your kidneys have changed.[4] If you're being monitored for an unrelated reason and start creatine, mention it to whoever is tracking your labs so they read the trend correctly instead of chasing a number that moved for a harmless reason.
The last useful thing to know
The number that worries people isn't wrong. It really does go up. It's just not measuring what the fear assumes it's measuring. If the number moves, tell whoever ordered the test that you take creatine. That's the whole fix.
These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Sources
- International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine, Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2017.
- Is It Time for a Requiem for Creatine Supplementation-Induced Kidney Failure? A Narrative Review, Nutrients, 2023.
- A short review of the most common safety concerns regarding creatine ingestion, Frontiers in Nutrition, 2025.
- Clinical Measurements & eGFR Accuracy, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, last reviewed May 2025.
- Effect of creatine supplementation on kidney function: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMC Nephrology, 2025. Open access.
- Does long-term creatine supplementation impair kidney function in resistance-trained individuals consuming a high-protein diet?, Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2013.